Free Trump Now!

 Trump's NYC trial is indeed a sham and election interference because it targets a political opponent during an election cycle, leveraging biased legal proceedings and questionable testimonies like Michael Cohen's. It's an attempt to influence public opinion and undermine the integrity of our 2024 presidential campaign!  

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Citizen's Nationwide Condemns Bias in Trump Trial, Highlights Political Interference and Flawed Jury Instructions

Washington, D.C. — Citizens Nationwide strongly condemns the blatant bias and political interference evident in the trial of former President Donald J. Trump. Judge Juan Merchan's actions—imposing excessive gag orders, issuing unwarranted contempt fines, and consistently ruling in favor of the prosecution—demonstrate a clear partisan agenda designed to undermine Trump.

Notably, two high-ranking members of Joe Biden's Justice Department, Mark Pomerantz and Carey Dunne, left their positions specifically to lead this prosecution. This raises significant concerns about the trial's political motivations and its role in election interference.

Adding to these concerns, Judge Merchan's flawed jury instructions further skew the trial against President Trump. By providing instructions that favor the prosecution and limit the defense's ability to present a full and fair case, Judge Merchan is undermining the integrity of the judicial process. These biased instructions are a direct attempt to influence the jury's decision and derail President Trump's 2024 campaign.

This unfair treatment highlights our legal system's urgent need for impartial justice.

EDITORIAL ESSAY: 

 Political Bias and Election Interference: The Impact of Donald Trump's Trial on the 2024 Election 

The trial of former President Donald J. Trump in New York City is poised to significantly impact the 2024 election, underscoring concerns about political interference. Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to hush money payments to Stormy Daniels. The trial, characterized by allegations of bias and partisanship, has become a focal point in the political landscape.

Judge Juan Merchan's handling of the trial has been criticized for demonstrating clear bias against Trump. His decisions to impose excessive gag orders, issue unwarranted contempt fines, and consistently rule in favor of the prosecution indicate a partisan agenda. Judge Merchan's jury instructions, which do not require unanimity on the specific crime Trump intended to conceal and exclude stricter standards for proving intent, are seen as favoring the prosecution​. This approach lowers the bar for conviction and obscures the complexity of legal issues, potentially prejudicing the jury against Trump.

The involvement of Mark Pomerantz and Carey Dunne, two high-ranking DOJ officials who left their positions to lead the prosecution, further fuels accusations of political motivation. Their transition from the Justice Department to the prosecution team is perceived as an effort to influence the 2024 election by targeting a major political opponent. This move raises questions about the impartiality of the trial and suggests an agenda to derail Trump's candidacy.

Moreover, concerns about potential conflicts of interest have been amplified by revelations about Judge Merchan's daughter, who has reportedly been involved in political activities supporting Democratic candidates. This connection casts doubt on the judge's ability to remain impartial and raises ethical questions about whether he might personally benefit from the trial's outcome​.

The trial's timing and conduct are seen by many as strategic efforts to undermine Trump's 2024 campaign. By entangling Trump in legal battles and potentially disqualifying him from running, the trial is viewed as a form of election interference that could skew the democratic process. The significant media coverage and public attention surrounding the trial further amplify its potential to influence voter perceptions and the overall electoral landscape.

In summary, the trial of Donald Trump is not merely a legal proceeding but a significant political event with the potential to shape the 2024 election. Allegations of judicial bias, political motivations behind the prosecution, and conflicts of interest highlight broader concerns about democracy and the rule of law in the United States. This trial underscores the urgent need for impartial justice and fair electoral processes to ensure the integrity of American democracy.

NEVER BACK DOWN

In the wake of former President Donald Trump's conviction, his supporters have an essential role in sustaining his campaign's momentum during this critical period. Active involvement in the campaign is crucial. Volunteers are needed to organize rallies, distribute literature, make phone calls, and engage with the community to ensure the campaign's message remains strong and visible. By contributing their time and energy, supporters can help build a grassroots movement that demonstrates widespread backing for Trump.

Financial contributions are equally vital. Donations can help fund campaign activities, legal fees, advertisements, and other essential expenses, reinforcing the campaign's presence nationwide. Even small contributions add up, demonstrating widespread Trump backing the campaign's ability to reach voters and counteract negative narratives. Supporters can set up monthly donations or participate in fundraising events to maximize their financial support.

Wearing Trump gear, such as hats, shirts, and buttons, serves as a powerful symbol of solidarity and support. These items create a visual statement that the movement remains robust and unwavering, fostering a sense of community and shared purpose among supporters. Displaying Trump signs in yards, on cars, and in windows also helps keep the campaign's visibility high.

Social media is another critical tool for Trump's supporters. By sharing updates, expressing their views, and mobilizing others online, they can amplify their collective voice. Engaging in respectful and constructive dialogue on platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram helps spread the campaign's message and attract new supporters. Creating and sharing content that highlights Trump's policies and accomplishments can counteract negative media coverage and keep his achievements at the forefront of public discourse.

In these challenging times, the resilience of Trump's supporters is paramount. By staying engaged, contributing financially, and proudly displaying their allegiance, they can ensure that the campaign remains a formidable force. Never Back Down—together, the movement can persevere and triumph, showing that dedication and unity can overcome any obstacle.

Washington, D.C. – As the nation anticipates the sentencing of former President Donald Trump on July 11, 2024, by Judge Juan Marchan, concerns about judicial impartiality and political interference have come to the forefront. The controversial involvement of the Biden Administration in the legal proceedings against Trump has cast a shadow over the integrity of the judicial process.

The charges against Trump for alleged election interference have been heavily scrutinized. Evidence presented during the trial suggests a deliberate effort by the Biden Administration to weaponize the justice system against a political opponent. Notably, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg's meetings at the White House have raised significant concerns. Reports indicate that these meetings were part of a broader strategy to plan and execute the legal actions against Trump, highlighting an unprecedented level of political meddling.

Critics argue that the Biden Administration's actions are not just about addressing alleged misconduct but are part of a calculated effort to eliminate a key political rival. This perception of judicial manipulation has led many to question whether Trump's trial and potential sentencing are based on legal merits or political vendettas.

In a stark comparison, some have likened Judge Marchan's courtroom to the corrupt halls of New York City's infamous Tammany Hall. Historically known for its political corruption and manipulation, Tammany Hall's shadow looms over this case, evoking memories of a judicial system swayed by political power rather than justice. This analogy underscores the fears of many Americans who worry that history is repeating itself, with political agendas taking precedence over fair and impartial legal proceedings.

As Judge Marchan prepares to deliver his sentence, the pressure to impose a harsh penalty on Trump is immense. However, the implications of such a decision extend beyond the individual case, potentially undermining public trust in the judicial system and setting a dangerous precedent for future administration.

Merchan's Biased Courtroom

Judge Juan Merchan's actions in Donald Trump's trial reveal a clear bias against the former President. Imposing excessive gag orders, issuing unwarranted contempt fines, and consistently ruling in favor of the prosecution demonstrate a partisan agenda. Notably, two high-ranking members of Joe Biden's Justice Department, Mark Pomerantz and Carey Dunne, left their jobs to take over this prosecution. This, coupled with Merchan's conduct, highlights the trial's political motivations and its role in election interference. This unfair treatment is designed to undermine Trump and derail his 2024 campaign, showcasing the trial's role in election interference.

Corrupt Jury Instructions Given by Judge Merchan:

1. Unanimity Not Required for Predicate Crimes:
   Judge Merchan instructed that jurors do not need to unanimously agree on which specific underlying crime Donald Trump intended to conceal when falsifying business records. This allows for a conviction even if jurors have different interpretations of Trump's intent.
2. Standard Definition of Intent:
   Merchan rejected the defense's request to emphasize that the prosecution must prove Trump acted with specific intent to defraud. Instead, the standard legal language was used, which some argue does not sufficiently highlight the need to prove Trump’s deliberate intent to commit a crime.

Exclusion of Dual Intent Requirement:
The judge decided against including a defense-proposed instruction requiring the prosecution to prove two separate intents: one for falsifying records and another for the crime furthered by the falsification. The defense argued this additional layer of intent was crucial for a fair assessment of Trump's actions.

Accomplice Liability:
Instructions on "accomplice liability" were debated, with prosecutors arguing that Trump could be convicted based on causing others to create false ledger entries. The judge was inclined to include this but ultimately decided to remove specific language proposed by the defense.

Handling of Campaign Expense Definition:

Merchan suggested instructions clarifying whether payments to Stormy Daniels should be considered campaign expenses, which could influence the jury's understanding of the payments' legality concerning election laws.

Criticisms of the Instructions:

Bias Toward Prosecution: The instructions are seen as favoring the prosecution by simplifying the requirements for conviction and not incorporating stricter standards of proving intent. This is perceived as undermining the defense's argument that Trump did not act with criminal intent.

Complexity and Fairness: By not requiring unanimity on the specific crime Trump intended to conceal, the instructions could lead to a conviction based on a fragmented jury consensus. This could be seen as lowering the bar for what constitutes guilt.

Impact on Jury Deliberations: The rejection of dual intent and standard intent definitions potentially obscures the complexity of the legal issues, making it harder for the jury to fully grasp the necessity of proving Trump's specific intent to defraud.

These points illustrate why Judge Merchan's jury instructions were flawed and biased, raising concerns about the fairness of the trial process, as well as the DOJ's and Biden Administration's Interference in the 2024 Election interpret Trump's intent differently that Trump acted specifically.